Difference: SplitClusterStudy (1 vs. 2)

Revision 22017-12-06 - AdamHunyadi

Line: 1 to 1
 
META TOPICPARENT name="AdamHunyadi"

Split Cluster Study

Links

Changed:
<
<

Checklist for the current issues

  • The pileup mixing seems to throw away all the digis that are coming from the mixed pileup. This makes it difficult to add the digi markers. For now, I don't do pileup scans.
>
>

Issues

  • The pileup mixing seems to throw away all the digis that are coming from the mixed pileup. This makes it difficult to add the digi markers.
  • The digi collection does not exactly contain the same pixels as the cluster collection. Mostly the digis is a bigger set (with all the cluster pixels available in it), but for now on I create a lookup table and add zero markers for any extra cluster digis that might turn up. The rate of "mocked digis" is a good number to pay attention to when running the simulations even on the grid.

TODOs

  • Add modifications to the pileup mixing modules so that it propagates the digi flag collection from the mixed data and it can be combined to a correct flag collection
 

Results

Revision 12017-12-04 - AdamHunyadi

Line: 1 to 1
Added:
>
>
META TOPICPARENT name="AdamHunyadi"

Split Cluster Study

Links

Checklist for the current issues

  • The pileup mixing seems to throw away all the digis that are coming from the mixed pileup. This makes it difficult to add the digi markers. For now, I don't do pileup scans.

Results

Plans for the analysis

-- AdamHunyadi - 2017-12-04

 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by Perl This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platformCopyright &© by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback