TWiki
>
Main Web
>
TWikiUsers
>
AdamHunyadi
>
SplitClusterStudy
(revision 7) (raw view)
Edit
Attach
---+ Split Cluster Study ---++ Links * [[https://github.com/hunyadix/SplitClusterStudy][Git repository for the analyzer]] * [[https://github.com/hunyadix/cmssw/tree/ModForPixelMerger][Git repository for the CMSSW modifications]] * [[https://github.com/hunyadix/Histogram-Merger][Git repository for the histogram merger tool]] ---++ Issues * The pileup mixing seems to throw away all the digis that are coming from the mixed pileup. This makes it difficult to add the digi markers. * The digi collection does not _exactly_ contain the same pixels as the cluster collection. Mostly the digis is a bigger set (with all the cluster pixels available in it), but for now on I create a lookup table and add zero markers for any extra cluster digis that might turn up. The rate of "mocked digis" is a good number to pay attention to when running the simulations even on the grid. ---++ TODOs * Add modifications to the pileup mixing modules so that it propagates the digi flag collection from the mixed data and it can be combined to a correct flag collection * Modify the histogram merger code not to merge the "ModuleClusterPlots" even if they are from the same run/lumiblock/event ---++ Recipe to run the framework ---+++ Deploy script <verbatim> export SCRAM_ARCH=slc6_amd64_gcc530 cmsrel CMSSW_9_3_0_pre1 cd CMSSW_9_3_0_pre1src cmsenv git cms init git cms-addpkg SimTracker/SiPixelDigitizer git cms-addpkg RecoLocalTracker/SiPixelClusterizer git remote add hunyadix git@github.com:hunyadix/cmssw.git git fetch hunyadix git checkout -t hunyadix/ModForPixelMerger ... </verbatim> ---+++ Generating a CMSSW config file <verbatim> cmsDriver.py \ -s GEN,SIM,DIGI,L1,DIGI2RAW,RAW2DIGI,RECO \ --evt_type SingleNuE10_cfi \ --process PrivateRECO \ --conditions auto:phase1_2017_realistic \ --era Run2_2017 \ --geometry DB:Extended \ --pileup Flat_0_50_25ns \ --relval 9000,50 \ --beamspot Realistic25ns13TeVEarly2017Collision \ --filein /store/relval/CMSSW_9_0_0_pre4/RelValMinBias_13/GEN-SIM/90X_upgrade2017_realistic_v6-v1/10000/0047A0C1-BDEC-E611-8FD9-0CC47A4D7630.root \ --pileup_input das:/RelValMinBias_13/CMSSW_9_2_3-92X_upgrade2017_realistic_v1_earlyBS2017-v1/GEN-SIM \ --eventcontent RECOSIM \ --datatier GEN-SIM-RECO \ --fileout file:GenNu_FlatPileup0to50_GENSIMRECO.root \ --python_filename PhaseI_GenNu_FlatPileup0to50_cfg.py \ --runUnscheduled \ -n 10 \ --no_exec </verbatim> For no PU, I usually generate TTbar events. ---+++ Running the HistogramMerger Running the HistogramMerger is as simple as checking out the git repository and specifying the target files and the output name in src/main.cxx. ---++++ How to add dynamic inefficiency The tag is set when the db file is generated. <verbatim> # Add dynamic inefficiency to simulate dcol losses dynIneff_db = 'sqlite_file:phase1_efficiencies_95_pure.db' dynIneff_tag = 'SiPixelDynamicInefficiency_v1' process.DynIneffReader = cms.ESSource("PoolDBESSource", DBParameters = cms.PSet( messageLevel = cms.untracked.int32(0), authenticationPath = cms.untracked.string('')), toGet = cms.VPSet(cms.PSet( record = cms.string("SiPixelDynamicInefficiencyRcd"), tag = cms.string(dynIneff_tag))), connect = cms.string(dynIneff_db)) process.dynineffprefer = cms.ESPrefer("PoolDBESSource", "DynIneffReader") </verbatim> ---++ Results TTbar events, no pileup, 95% dcol efficiency statistics files: <verbatim> /store/user/ahunyadi/SCS/Run2_CMSSW93X/SCS_93X_mcRun2_DynIneff_95_GEN_SIM_RAWTODIGI_evt100000 </verbatim> ---++ Plans for the analysis -- Main.AdamHunyadi - 2017-12-04
Edit
|
Attach
|
Watch
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
:
r11
|
r9
<
r8
<
r7
<
r6
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Raw edit
|
More topic actions...
Topic revision: r7 - 2017-12-14
-
AdamHunyadi
Main
Log In
Main Web
Create New Topic
Index
Search
Changes
Notifications
RSS Feed
Statistics
Preferences
Webs
CMS
HEP
Main
RmiGrid
RmiVirgo
Sandbox
TWiki
Copyright &© by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki?
Send feedback